Pathways Training Program: Session 2: Delineating and Granting Clinical Privileges_Enduring
Like credentialing, privileging has changed a lot. When privileging started, there was a presumption that every physician was qualified to treat the skin and all of its contents (or even more in the case of psychiatrists), if the service was arguably within their specialty. Privileging has evolved into a meticulously detailed process of defining the types of treatments and procedures that should be grouped together by specialty, and the specific education, training, and experience that a practitioner must demonstrate in order to apply for that grouping of privileges. And there’s even FPPE to top it all off!
During this second session of the 2025 Pathways series, we will discuss the full range of privileging issues challenging health systems, hospitals, and physician leaders, including privileges that cross specialty lines, privileges that cross disciplines, and privileges for new treatments and procedures. We will lend particular attention to the most pressing privileging issue of modern times: specialty-specific privileging for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants.
Target Audience
This CME activity is designed for nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, physicians, physician assistants, and psychologists to enhance their understanding of credentialing practices and health status evaluations, ensuring both patient safety and practitioner support.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this audio conference, participants will be able to:
- Identify those classes of practitioners who must be granted “clinical privileges” to provide patient care services in the hospital.
- Identify how the education, training, and experience of Advanced Practice Clinicians differs from that of physicians, dentists, and podiatrists and, in turn, can impact how hospitals and medical staffs evaluate their current clinical competence and delineate eligibility for specific clinical privileges that may fall outside of the formal education or training completed.
- Develop processes that separate administrative policy determinations from subjective evaluations of practitioner qualifications, to provide better consistency and fairness when considering requests/proposals for new privileges or privileges that cross specialty lines, blanket waivers for categories of practitioners (e.g., moonlighting), and clinical privileges for practitioners re-entering practice after some time away.
- Identify best practices and accreditation requirements related to confirmation of practitioner competence for new privileges, and how those practices can be rolled-out in the context of unique privileging scenarios (such as telemedicine, temporary privileges, and disaster privileges).
SPECIAL NOTE:
This site is designed to supplement training that has already occurred and should be used to administer the post-test, collect CME evaluations, and issue credit.
Presenter:
Charles J. Chulack, JD. Partner, Horty, Springer & Mattern, PC.
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
Mary Paterni, JD. Associate Attorney, Horty, Springer & Mattern, PC.
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
Planning Committee:
Marianne Crosby, Director, Horty, Springer & Mattern, PC.
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
No members of the planning committee, speakers, presenters, authors, content reviewers and/or anyone else in a position to control the content of this education activity have relevant financial relationships with any proprietary entity producing, marketing, re-selling, or distributing health care goods or services, used on, or consumed by, patients to disclose.
Accreditation Statement:
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by the University of Pittsburgh and Horty Springer Seminars. The University of Pittsburgh is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Physicians:
The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine designates this enduring material activity for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Other health care professionals:
Other health care professionals will receive a certificate of attendance confirming the number of contact hours commensurate with the extent of participation in this activity.
Available Credit
- 2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
- 2.00 Attendance
SPECIAL NOTE:
The educational content for this course is posted on HortySpringer Pathways Webinar Series - Horty Springer. You should log in or register here only after you review the educational content for this course.
Choose Register/Complete Course to complete all of the required modules. You must complete the modules in order.
First time Users: If you have never completed training on this website, please select register in the upper right hand corner of the webpage.
Returning Users: If you have completed training on this website, please log in in the upper right hand corner of the webpage.

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Forward