Horty Springer - 11/16/20 & 12/4/20 -PPE_Peer Review Training- Dartmouth_Enduring
The “peer review” world is changing dramatically – and for the better! Whether the issue is clinical quality, conduct, health, or utilization, it is possible to create an effective process that achieves the two major goals of peer review: patient safety and physician success.
Through interactive presentations, real-life case studies, videos, and supplemental forms and materials, The Peer Review Clinic provides participants with practical, experience-tested tips and tools that permit them to transform their processes when they get back home.
SPECIAL NOTE:
There is no educational content to this course. This course is designed to supplement training that has already occurred. This course is designed to only provide the required post test and collect CME evaluations.
Target Audience
This course was designed for hospital administrators, physicians and clinicians who need to be better informed about how to manage and possibly improve their overall performance.
Suggested Additional Reading
- The Objective Impact of Clinical Peer Review on Hospital Quality and Safety, Marc Edwards, M.D., M.B.A., American Journal of Medical Quality 26(2):110-9 (Dec. 2010).
- Joint Commission Standards:
- The Joint Commission: https://www.jointcommission.org/
- The Joint Commission 2020 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, MS.08.01.01
- The Joint Commission 2020 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, MS.08.01.03
- The Joint Commission 2020 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, MS.09.01.01
- Disruptive Behaviors Among Physicians, Luis T. Sanchez, M.D. JAMA. 2014;312(21):2209-2210. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10218
Learning Objectives
Upon successful completion of this program, the participant should be able to:
- Implement the new peer review process to improve clinical performance.
- Implement the new peer review process for concerns related to professional behavior.
- Identify and practice implementing the most common performance improvement options for clinical concerns.
Phillip W. Zarone, JD — Partner with the law firm of Horty, Springer & Mattern, P.C.
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
All presenters disclosure of relevant financial relationships with any entity producing, marketing, re-selling, or distributing health care goods or services, used on, or consumed by, patients is listed above. No other planners, members of the planning committee, speakers, presenters, authors, content reviewers and/or anyone else in a position to control the content of this education activity have relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Joint Provider Accreditation Statement:
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by the University of Pittsburgh and HortySpringer Seminars. The University of Pittsburgh is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine designates this enduring material activity for a maximum of 5.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Each physician should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Other health care professionals will receive a certificate of attendance confirming the number of contact hours commensurate with the extent of participation in this activity.
Available Credit
- 5.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
- 5.75 Attendance