COE Intake Paperwork Reduction - JHF
Participants will review the differences between Clinical Intake and Care Management intake, and learn about the negative impacts on clients and issues with lengthy intake processes. The session will also cover common barriers to streamlining intake processes and tactics and strategies to address barriers and improve the intake process. The session will also include strategies for incorporating client orientation at intake, involving families, and deploying trauma informed care and motivational interviewing techniques in the intake process.
Agenda:
- Introduction
- Background
- Care Management Intake vs. Clinical Intake
- The problem with lengthy intake processes
- Connection to COE Fidelity Guidelines
- Barriers and Challenges
- Paperwork redundancy
- Lack of technology
- Staff resistance
- Clients overwhelmed
- Policy/regulatory requirements
- Benefits of Streamlined Intake
- Client benefits: Reduced anxiety, improved clarity, better engagement
- Staff benefits: Efficiency, reduced duplication, improved workflow Challenges to streamlining
- Strategies for Improvement
- Standardized intake forms
- Motivational interviewing and trauma-informed design
- Electronic forms with conditional logic
- Focus on essential information
- User-friendly formats
- Client Orientation
- Benefits of orienting clients at intake
- Core components of orientation
- Outcomes: retention, engagement, reduced stigma, autonomy
- Family Involvement
- Benefits of including families at intake
- Strategies: open-ended questions, client-defined family, cultural respect, safety/consent
- Trauma-Informed and Motivational Interviewing Practices
- Purpose of MI at intake: engagement, alliance, attrition reduction
- Trauma-informed practices: safety, trust, client-centered care
- Intake Implementation Plan
- Key Takeaways
- Questions/ Discussion
Target Audience
- Nurse
- Physician
- Social Worker
Learning Objectives
- Describe intake processes at COEs.
- Discuss the benefits to clients and staff of a streamlined intake process
- Discuss common intake barriers, including redundancies in assessments and questions
Additional Information
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 50.71 KB | |
| 45.92 KB | |
| 1015.58 KB |
Participants will review the differences between Clinical Intake and Care Management intake, and learn about the negative impacts on clients and issues with lengthy intake processes. The session will also cover common barriers to streamlining intake processes and tactics and strategies to address barriers and improve the intake process. The session will also include strategies for incorporating client orientation at intake, involving families, and deploying trauma informed care and motivational interviewing techniques in the intake process.
Agenda:
- Introduction
- Background
- Care Management Intake vs. Clinical Intake
- The problem with lengthy intake processes
- Connection to COE Fidelity Guidelines
- Barriers and Challenges
- Paperwork redundancy
- Lack of technology
- Staff resistance
- Clients overwhelmed
- Policy/regulatory requirements
- Benefits of Streamlined Intake
- Client benefits: Reduced anxiety, improved clarity, better engagement
- Staff benefits: Efficiency, reduced duplication, improved workflow Challenges to streamlining
- Strategies for Improvement
- Standardized intake forms
- Motivational interviewing and trauma-informed design
- Electronic forms with conditional logic
- Focus on essential information
- User-friendly formats
- Client Orientation
- Benefits of orienting clients at intake
- Core components of orientation
- Outcomes: retention, engagement, reduced stigma, autonomy
- Family Involvement
- Benefits of including families at intake
- Strategies: open-ended questions, client-defined family, cultural respect, safety/consent
- Trauma-Informed and Motivational Interviewing Practices
- Purpose of MI at intake: engagement, alliance, attrition reduction
- Trauma-informed practices: safety, trust, client-centered care
- Intake Implementation Plan
- Key Takeaways
- Questions/ Discussion
Julie Brewer MSW, MPH
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by the University of Pittsburgh and The Jewish Healthcare Foundation. The University of Pittsburgh is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
As a Jointly Accredited Organization, University of Pittsburgh is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved under this program. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. University of Pittsburgh maintains responsibility for this course. Social workers completing this course receive 1.25 continuing education credits.
Physician (CME)
The University of Pittsburgh designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Nursing (CNE)
The maximum number of hours awarded for this Continuing Nursing Education activity is 1.25 contact hours.
Social Work (ASWB)
The maximum number of hours awarded for this Continuing Social Work Education activity is 1.25 contact hours.
Other health care professionals will receive a certificate of attendance confirming the number of contact hours commensurate with the extent of participation in this activity.
Available Credit
- 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
- 1.25 ANCCUPMC Provider Unit is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation
- 1.25 ASWB
- 1.25 Attendance

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Forward